Skip to content

Accepting EPS in Austria

EPS is the Austrian online bank transfer scheme, letting a customer pay directly from their account through their own online banking environment. In a market where consumers are comfortable paying from the bank rather than from a card, it belongs in any Austrian checkout.

Set-up

How to accept EPS as a merchant

You do not contract with the scheme. Acceptance runs through an Austrian bank or a PSP connected to EPS. The customer authenticates inside their own banking environment and the payment is confirmed in real time, so the funds position is certain at checkout rather than at settlement.

Economics

Why bank transfer economics differ from cards

There is no interchange and no scheme fee in the card sense, which is why bank transfer usually prices below card acceptance and why the advantage disappears completely under a blended rate. If EPS carries a meaningful share of your Austrian revenue and you cannot see its rate as a separate line, that advantage is being collected by someone, and it is not you.

Verification

Verification of Payee is now a step inside the customer’s payment, and your name is in it

The instant payments regulation is usually summarised as speed and price. The part that touches a merchant’s conversion is neither.

Regulation (EU) 2024/886 requires the payer’s payment service provider to offer the payer a service ensuring verification of the payee to whom the payer intends to send a credit transfer, performed immediately after the payer provides relevant information about the payee and before the payer is offered the possibility of authorising that credit transfer. Where the details do not match, the service informs the payer that authorising the credit transfer might lead to transferring the funds to a payment account not held by the payee indicated by the payer. In the euro area, Austria included, that has applied since 9 October 2025.

In an EPS payment the payee is you. So the name registered on the account behind your IBAN, the name on your invoice and the name the customer reads at checkout now meet on one screen inside their banking app, and a mismatch produces a warning at the exact moment they were about to authorise. Trading names, group entities and recently changed legal names are the usual causes. Nobody reports it as a payment failure, because it is not one. It appears as an abandoned bank transfer and reads like ordinary drop-off. Checking that the three names agree is an afternoon of work, and it goes unchecked precisely because it belongs to no department.

Austria in the wider European picture

Austria sits inside the eurozone, so Regulation (EU) 2024/886 applies: payment service providers had to be able to receive instant euro payments from 9 January 2025 and send them from 9 October 2025, at fees no higher than for ordinary transfers, with Verification of Payee required from 9 October 2025. Cheap, instant, universally available account transfer is the foundation that domestic bank transfer schemes were built on top of, and it is now becoming standard infrastructure across the euro area.

Which payment provider supports EPS for merchants in Austria?

hobex and mPAY24 in Austria, alongside Computop and Saferpay, all document EPS, among others, as do most gateways serving the DACH region. The useful questions are what an EPS transaction costs against your effective Austrian card rate at your average order value, whether it is reported separately, and whether your Austrian pricing was negotiated on Austrian volume or inherited from a German or European agreement.

Value date

The money is credited on one day and available on another, and the law names both

Bank transfer is sold on speed, and speed at the customer’s end of the chain does not automatically mean speed at yours. Between the authorisation and money you can actually spend there are two distinct moments, and European law addresses each.

Article 87(1) of Directive (EU) 2015/2366 provides that Member States shall ensure that the credit value date for the payee’s payment account is no later than the business day on which the amount of the payment transaction is credited to the payee’s payment service provider’s account. Article 87(2) requires the payee’s payment service provider to ensure that the amount of the payment transaction is at the payee’s disposal immediately after that amount is credited to the payee’s payment service provider’s account.

Immediately, and no later than the same business day. Those are obligations European law places on the payee’s payment service provider, not courtesies it extends. Put a number on the gap: on 20 million euros of annual bank transfer volume, one extra day of settlement delay leaves roughly 55,000 euros permanently parked outside your business, and two days leaves 110,000. At a 6 per cent cost of capital that is 3,300 to 6,600 euros a year of financing cost on money that is supposed to be at your disposal already. Settlement timing rarely reaches the agenda when a contract is negotiated, because it is not a rate. It is still cash.

Reviewing what this costs you

What you pay is set in your PSP contract, not by the scheme. Start by establishing whether you are overpaying your PSP, or move straight to cutting your PSP costs, because a cheap method priced badly still costs more than it should.

Relevant markets: Austria

Look up another payment method

Girocard logoGoogle Pay logoGiropay logoHipercard logoiDEAL logoin3 logoInterac logoJCB logoKakaoPay logoKlarna logoKonbini logoMaestro logo

All 64 payment methods

One conversation is enough to know whether there is anything here

A thirty-minute Teams call, on your own figures. You pay no upfront fee on any of the services. Nothing to prepare, the outline is enough.